Sometimes when I'm really in the mood to self-flagellate, I wonder what I'd be like if I were doing everything to the best of my ability all the time. How healthy would I be? How much time would I save? How many more books would I have read or big ideas would I understand? It's exhausting (and inefficient, hah) to think about it, especially since peak capacity has always struck me as a bit of a false concept. If you can't function consistently at a given level, is optimization really within the realm of what's possible?
With a little help, maybe! In a 2007 feature for WIRED, Noah Shachtman stepped inside the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Defense Sciences Office, a division focused on developing new devices and technologies for human enhancement. From gloves that give you a boost of energy to chemicals that slow metabolism, this division's initiatives could, Shachtman wrote, meaningfully boost human functioning. "You know the old Army saying, 'Be all that you can be'? Well, that's really what we're doing," Tony Tether, then the head of the division, explained. In training, soldiers "become extraordinary in strength and endurance. But it's not any better than their body can be. And what we try to do is come up with techniques that allow them to maintain that level."
At the time Shachtman penned the piece, most of these top-secret projects were still in petri dishes and lab rats. But it seemed like a very real possibility that they might one day be used by humans—particularly on the battlefield. This raises another question: Even if we can boost human functioning to its uppermost limits, should we? What will that do to how we fight wars, and to how we live in community with each other? It seems like an existential minefield to me, and I'm not sure I have the answers. I'd love to hear what you think! Write me a note or let me know in the comments beneath the story.
See you next week!
Eve
No comments:
Post a Comment
🤔